首页> 外文OA文献 >The Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom (OCS) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: a comparison between Swedish children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from a specialized unit, regular outpatients and a school sample.
【2h】

The Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom (OCS) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: a comparison between Swedish children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from a specialized unit, regular outpatients and a school sample.

机译:儿童行为检查表的强迫症状(OCs)量表:来自专业单位,常规门诊患者和学校样本的瑞典儿童强迫症的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To evaluate the discriminative power of various items as reported by parents in the OCS-scale extracted from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) problem scale and to compare findings with outcomes of previous validation studies. Children referred to a specialized child psychiatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) clinic (OCD group) (n=185) receiving a formal OCD diagnosis according to DSM IV criteria based on interviews with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) were compared to a sample recruited from regular child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics (CPO group) (n=177). Both samples were compared to a normative school sample (SS group) and all three groups were matched for age and gender. Thirty seven CBCL items, mostly representing core internalizing symptoms and parts of the thought problem scale as well as physical and sleep problems, were first identified. Ten of these items (including all discriminative items in previous validation studies) could distinguish children with OCD from CPO patients. In a subsequent analysis, the results of a logistic regression showed that four CBCL items, "Obsessions," "Fearful and Anxious," "Compulsions," and "Worries" remained significant predictors. These four OCS items and previously used CBCL OCS-scales were further examined by means of ROC-analysis showing that the "Obsessions" and "Compulsions" CBCL items were the strongest predictors. These two CBCL items performed well as screens for OCS symptoms in children and adolescents and the addition of similar CBCL items did not further increase sensitivity or specificity. It is suggested that parental responses on these two items could preferably be used as screen for OCD in children and adolescents in regular child psychiatric clinics.
机译:评估父母从儿童行为清单(CBCL)问题量表中提取的OCS量表中各项报告的判别力,并将结果与​​先前的验证研究结果进行比较。根据DSM IV标准,接受儿童Yale-Brown强迫症量表(CY-)采访的儿童转入专门的儿童精神科强迫症(OCD)诊所(OCD组)(n = 185),接受了正式的OCD诊断。将BOCS与从常规儿童和青少年精神科门诊诊所(CPO组)招募的样本进行比较(n = 177)。将这两个样本与标准学校样本(SS组)进行比较,并且对所有三个组的年龄和性别进行匹配。首先确定了37项CBCL项,主要代表核心内在症状和部分思想问题量表以及身体和睡眠问题。这些项目中的十个项目(包括先前验证研究中的所有区分性项目)可以将OCD儿童与CPO患者区分开。在随后的分析中,逻辑回归的结果表明,CBCL的四个项目,“沉迷”,“恐惧与焦虑”,“强迫”和“担忧”仍然是重要的预测指标。通过ROC分析进一步检查了这四个OCS项目和以前使用的CBCL OCS量表,表明“痴迷”和“强迫” CBCL项目是最强的预测因子。这两个CBCL项目在筛查儿童和青少年的OCS症状方面表现良好,并且添加类似的CBCL项目并没有进一步提高敏感性或特异性。建议父母对这两个项目的反应最好用作常规儿童精神病诊所中儿童和青少年的强迫症筛查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ivarsson, Tord; Larsson, Bo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号